History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Stout
31 Mo. 406
Mo.
1861
Check Treatment
Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The refusal of the court to give the third instruction asked by the defendant, taken in connection with the seventh given *407for the State, had a tendency to withdraw from the jury altogether the question of self-defence. It is not usual for a court to point out a particular witness and tell the jury to disregard his testimony, if they think he has testified falsely in any material particular; and when this is done, and all instructions upon the defence which this witness’ testimony tends to establish are refused, the jury must understand the court to be of opinion that no case of self-defence is made out; in other words, that the testimony of the suspected witness.is entirely unworthy of credit. This conclusion may be correct, but it is the province of the jury, and not of the court, to pass upon the credibility of witnesses.

Judgment reversed and case remanded;

Judge Ewing concurs. Judge Scott absent.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Stout
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Jan 15, 1861
Citation: 31 Mo. 406
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.