History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Stewart
126 Or. App. 456
Or. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
RIGGS, J.

The state seeks reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Stewart, 123 Or App 147, 859 P2d 545 (1993), because the last two paragraphs of the opinion are inconsistent with one another. The state is correct. Defendant’s last assignment of error was not preserved. State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220, 224, 856 P2d 623 (1993). Accordingly, we modify the opinion to withdraw the paragraph in which we considered that assignment.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Stewart
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Feb 23, 1994
Citation: 126 Or. App. 456
Docket Number: 10-90-07017C; CA A71065
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.