216 N.W. 533 | Minn. | 1927
In their brief the defendants state that they "were convicted of being the keepers of a disorderly house in the city of Minneapolis, contrary to the city ordinance." They invoke the rule that single or isolated disorderly or immoral acts on the premises are not sufficient to constitute the place a disorderly house within the meaning of the penal laws, and urge that under that rule the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the conviction. This is the only ground for reversal urged.
The action of the lower court cannot be reversed on such an incomplete record. Furthermore the evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding that the place was conducted as a disorderly house within the meaning of the ordinance.
Order affirmed.