State v. SteneckState v. Steneck
Apr 29, 1938
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.