125 Iowa 307 | Iowa | 1904
I. Tbe first proposition advanced by counsel for appellánt is that tbe verdict of guilty is not warranted by tbe evidence. A reading of the record brings us to. a different conclusion. We shall not rehearse the testi
IY. Complaint is also made that the court during the course of the trial indulged in remarks having a tendency ' to influence the jury against the defendant. Many of the
Other exceptions to instructions given, and to the court’s refusal to give instructions asked, are assigned by counsel, but in our opinion, none of them are well founded.
We find nothing in the record to call for a reversal, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.