State v. Staw

Feb 2, 1922
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Curtaai
Pee Curtaai.

The judgment under review herein should’ be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Sway,zb, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, Iyalisch,, Black, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.