State v. StawState v. Staw
Feb 2, 1922
Versions:116 A. 42597 N.J.L. 34912 Gummere 3491922 N.J. LEXIS 210
The judgment under review herein should' be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Sway,zb, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, Iyalisch,, Black, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.