State v. Staw
97 N.J.L. 349
N.J.
1922
Check Treatment
Pee Curtaai.

The judgment under review herein should' be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Sway,zb, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, Iyalisch,, Black, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.