History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. St. John
17 N.C. App. 587
N.C. Ct. App.
1973
Check Treatment
HEDRICK, Judge.

The record contains no exceptions or assignments of error. The following appears in the record as appellant’s statement of case on appeal.

“I have made a study of this record, and I am unable to find any error save the very severe procedure which allows the State to introduce evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction and to permit the Solicitor to read to the jury the warrant which alleged the prior convictions.”

The procedure complained of was approved and held to be without error in the case of State v. Owenby, 10 N.C. App. 170, 177 S.E. 2d 749 (1970).

We have carefully examined the record and find no error on the face thereof. The defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Graham concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. St. John
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 14, 1973
Citation: 17 N.C. App. 587
Docket Number: No. 7315SC90
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.