midpage

State v. So Ho GeState v. So Ho Ge

Washington Supreme Court
May 31, 1890
No. 42
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Scott

Lead Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

Defendant was convicted of’ murder in the second ‍​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‍degree, upon an indictment failing to charge a purpose to kill. A motion by defendant in arrest of judgment was sustained. The state appeals.

In Leonard v. Territory, 2 Wash. T. 381, the court decided that it ‍​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‍was necessary to allege a purpose to kill in order to sustain a conviction for murder under- our *276statutes. We have followed that case in Blanton v. State, ante, p. 265.

The indictment in this case is sufficient to ‍​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‍charge manslaughter. These matters having been discussed in the last case cited, it is unnecessary to review here. Allowance of the motion in arrest of judgment was, therefore, error, and the same is ‍​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‍reversed. The cause is remanded, with instructions to the court below to sentence the defendant for manslaughter upon the conviction already had.

Stiles, J., concurs.





Concurrence Opinion

Hovt, J.,

concurs in the result in this case, but not ‍​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‍in the reasoning in the two cases, above referred to.

Anders, O. J., and Dunbar, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. So Ho Ge
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: May 31, 1890
Citations: 24 P. 442; 1 Wash. 275; 1890 Wash. LEXIS 57; No. 42
Docket Number: No. 42
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
Log In