History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Smith
381 So. 2d 825
La.
1980
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Defendant has challenged his adjudication as a multiple offender under *826Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976), claiming that he did not understand the nature of the charge against him in pleading guilty to attempt simple burglary in 1972. He did not state the grounds for his objection in the trial court and we will therefore not consider the question on direct review. La. C.Cr.P. Art. 841. Defendant’s opportunity for review is by application to the trial court for habeas corpus relief. See State v. Nelson, 379 So.2d 1072 (La.1980).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Mar 12, 1980
Citation: 381 So. 2d 825
Docket Number: No. 66030
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.