History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Smith
243 N.C. 172
N.C.
1955
Check Treatment
PER CuRiAM.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion as to whether'error prejudicial to defendant is shown in the record on this appeal, Higgins, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed without becoming a precedent. Cole v. R. R., 211 N.C. 591, 191 S.E. 353; Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735, and cases cited. See also Johnston v. Paper Co., 214 N.C. 828, 199 S.E. 20; Toxey v. Meggs, 216 N.C. 798, 4 S.E. 2d 513; Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N.C. 799, 4 S.E. 2d 616; Whitehurst v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 787, 44 S.E. 2d 358; S. v. Brown, 242 N.C. 602, 89 S.E. 2d 157; Refrigerator Co. v. Davenport, 242 N.C. 603, 89 S.E. 2d 153; Railway v. Railway, ante, 110, and numerous others.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 23, 1955
Citation: 243 N.C. 172
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.