midpage

State v. SmithState v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 23, 1955
Reporters:
, ,
PER CuRiAM.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion as to whether‘error prejudicial to defendant is shown in the record on this appeal, Higgins, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed without becoming a precedent. Cole v. R. R., 211 N.C. 591, 191 S.E. 353; Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735, and cases cited. See also Johnston v. Paper Co., 214 N.C. 828, 199 S.E. 20; Toxey v. Meggs, 216 N.C. 798, 4 S.E. 2d 513; Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N.C. 799, 4 S.E. 2d 616; Whitehurst v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 787, 44 S.E. 2d 358; S. v. Brown, 242 N.C. 602, 89 S.E. 2d 157; Refrigerator Co. v. Davenport, 242 N.C. 603, 89 S.E. 2d 153; Railway v. Railway, ante, 110, and numerous others.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 23, 1955
Citations: 243 N.C. 172; 90 S.E.2d 328; 1955 N.C. LEXIS 562
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In