History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Smith
23 So. 3d 229
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2009
Check Treatment
CORTIÑAS, J.

As in State v. Roberts, 963 So.2d 747 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), State v. Green, 932 So.2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), State v. Brownell, 922 So.2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), and State v. Mendez, 835 So.2d 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), we reverse the downward departure sentence entered pursuant to a court-initiated agreement with the defendant, in which the State did not participate, as it was unaccompanied by oral or written reasons justifying the departure. See State v. Barr, 947 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); State v. Alma, 947 So.2d 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); State v. Perez, 802 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), review denied, 823 So.2d 125 (Fla.2002); State v. Paulk, 813 So.2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review denied, 832 So.2d 105 (Fla.2002).

The sentence is therefore reversed with directions to enter sentence within the *230 guidelines or to permit the defendant to withdraw his plea.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Smith
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 9, 2009
Citation: 23 So. 3d 229
Docket Number: 3D08-2400
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In