History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Sisk
345 N.C. 749
N.C.
1997
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Johnson. We hold that defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Sisk
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Apr 11, 1997
Citation: 345 N.C. 749
Docket Number: No. 371A96
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.