State v. Silverman

Jan 31, 1936
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review heroin should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bobine, Heheb, Peeskie, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil Raeeeety, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.