| N.J. | Jan 31, 1936

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.