State v. SilverState v. Silver
Jan 19, 1925
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Then chard, Parker, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van JBuskirk, Clark, McGle.nnon, Kays, JJ. 12.
For reversal — -None.