State v. Silver

Jan 19, 1925
Versions:127 A. 164
101 N.J.L. 232
1925 N.J. LEXIS 220
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Then chard, Parker, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van JBuskirk, Clark, McGle.nnon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — -None.