History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Siferd
789 N.E.2d 237
Ohio
2003
Check Treatment

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on Proposition of Law No. X is affirmed on the authority of State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222.

Robert A. Fry, Hancock County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark C. Miller, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, Angie Greene and Jerry McHenry, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Siferd
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 11, 2003
Citation: 789 N.E.2d 237
Docket Number: No. 2003-0106
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In