State v. Siciliano

85 N.J.L. 389 | N.J. | 1913

Per Curiam.

The j udgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set. forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Ter-HUNE, HePPENHETMISR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.