STATE of Louisiana v. Newman SHIEF
No. 88-CA-345
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit
November 16, 1988
534 So. 2d 513
Elbert Lee Guillory, Opelousas, Philip J. Boudousqué, Gretna, for defendant-appellant.
Before CHEHARDY, GAUDIN and DUFRESNE, JJ.
The defendant, Newman Shief, was charged by bill of information on December 11, 1986 with possession of cocaine in violation of
The trial court failed to render a written signed judgment denying surety‘s motion to quash (to annul bond forfeiture). Thus, the motion for appeal is premature.
When a party posts an appearance bond, a suretyship agreement with the state is created. This agreement creates a civil contract based on an act under private signature, breach of which will lead to a money judgment against the surety. State v. Dunlevie, 503 So.2d 1004 (La.1987), Cormier v. Vidrine, 491 So.2d 397 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986).
Except for the purpose of determining jurisdiction, proceedings involving bond forfeitures are civil proceedings. State v. Dunlevie, supra; State v. Ledener, 253 La. 915, 221 So.2d 47 (1969). A judgment in the surety‘s action to annul a judgment of forfeiture is an appealable civil judgment. State v. Smith, 524 So.2d 898 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1988). Accordingly, the Code of Civil Procedure governs the method of appealing a bond forfeiture.
For the foregoing reasons, this appeal is dismissed at appellant‘s costs.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
