midpage

State v. . SherrillState v. . Sherrill

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 5, 1880
Reporters:
Before:
Dillard
Dillard, J.

As there was no final judgment in the court below, the appeal must ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‍be dismissed. State v. Keeter, 80 N. C., 472; State v. Bailey, 65 N. C., 426.

But as there seems to have been some misapprehension as to the effect of the decision in this case on ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‍the former appeal as reported in 81 N. C., 550, we will say, that the legal effect-of the appeal was to vacate the judgment below, and the error ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‍adjudged in this court by reason of the variance between the allegation and the proof, operated to put out of the way or vacate the verdict. And ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‍so, upon the certified opinion of this court, the defendant stood before the court *696 below in point of law charged upon a sufficient bill of indictment and is ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​‍entitled to a new trial. Let thi%be certified.

Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed and venire de novo.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Sherrill
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 5, 1880
Citation: 82 N.C. 694
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In