State v. Serlinsky

Oct 9, 1935
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodi'ne in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.