State v. Scott

Apr 9, 1990
Versions:571 A.2d 1304
118 N.J. 406
1990 N.J. LEXIS 35

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ashbey’s concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at 231 N.J.Super. at 269, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).





Dissenting Opinion

CLIFFORD, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brody’s opinion, reported at 231 N.J.Super. 258, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.

For affirmance — Justice CLIFFORD — 1.