State v. Scott, 571 A.2d 1304

State v. Scott

571 A.2d 1304

N.J.

1990

Check Treatment

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RORY SCOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

April 9, 1990

571 A.2d 1304

Argued January 30, 1990

ORDER

It is ORDERED that LESLIE A. DIENES of METUCHEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, be publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that LESLIE A. DIENES reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

571 A.2d 1304

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RORY SCOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued January 30, 1990-Decided April 9, 1990.

Steven J. Kaflowitz, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (John H. Stamler, Union County Prosecutor, attorney).

William J. McCarthy argued the cause for respondent.

Jessica S. Oppenheim, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ashbey‘s concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at

231 N.J.Super. at 269, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).

CLIFFORD, J., dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brody‘s opinion, reported at

231 N.J.Super. 258, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).

For reversal-Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O‘HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN-6.

For affirmance-Justice CLIFFORD-1.