History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Schumm
75 N.J. 199
| N.J. | 1978
|
Check Treatment
75 N.J. 199 (1978)
381 A.2d 33

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DAVID B. SCHUMM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 13, 1977.
Decided January 5, 1978.

Mr. Daniel J. Matyola argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wharton, Stewart and Davis, attorneys; Mr. Martin L. Gilbert, on the brief).

Mr. Simon L. Rosenbach argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stephen R. Champi, Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 146 N.J. Super. 30.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Schumm
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 5, 1978
Citation: 75 N.J. 199
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.