History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Schoolcraft
72 Vt. 223
Vt.
1900
Check Treatment
Munson, J.

In the court below the respondent-claimed that the indictment was defective for the reason that “it did not particularly in terms refer to sections 2703 and 2701 of the Vermont Statutes,” and for the further reason that it did not set forth that the deci-ee of divorce remained in effect at the time of the cohabiting. These points are not now urged. The points which are urged were not made in the court below, and therefore cannot be considered.

Judgment that there is no error in the proceedings and that the respondent take nothing hy his exceptions.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Schoolcraft
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Mar 9, 1900
Citation: 72 Vt. 223
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.