State v. Saunders, 361 A.2d 111

PER CURIAM.

The conviction of defendant is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bedford. Cf. Doe v. Commonwealth‘s Attorney for City of Richmond, D.C., 403 F. Supp. 1199, aff‘d ___ U.S. ___, 96 S.Ct. 1489, 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Saunders

Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Date Published: Jun 21, 1976

Citations: 361 A.2d 111; 142 N.J. Super. 287

Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.