State v. Saunders

Jun 21, 1976
Reporters:
,
Before:
Kole, Ard, Collester (per curiam)

PER CURIAM.

The conviction of defendant is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bedford. Cf. Doe v. Commonwealth‘s Attorney for City of Richmond, D.C., 403 F. Supp. 1199, aff‘d ___ U.S. ___, 96 S.Ct. 1489, 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).

Affirmed.