State v. Sapp
366 A.2d 334
N.J.
1976
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Morgan in her dissenting opinion. 144 N. J. Super. 455 at 460.

Three members of the Court would affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

For reversal—Chief Justice Hughes, Justices P ashman and Clifford and Judge Oonfoed—4.

For affirmance—Justices Mountain, Sullivan and Sghreiber—3.