midpage

State v. SantiagoState v. Santiago

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jul 29, 1998
No. 96-2818
Versions:713 So. 2d 1127
1998 WL 422239
1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524
PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order dismissing the charges against Appellee on the grounds that section 322.34(l)(a), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional. The issue here is the same as that recently resolved in State v. Keirn, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1144, — So.2d-(Fla. 4th DCA May 6, 1998), in which we concluded that said statute is constitutional.

We remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Keim.

STONE, C.J., and KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Santiago
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 29, 1998
Citations: 713 So. 2d 1127; 1998 WL 422239; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9524; No. 96-2818
Docket Number: No. 96-2818
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In