History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Sam
134 La. 376
La.
1914
Check Treatment
MONROE, J.

Defendants, having been charged with cattle stealing, moved to quash the bill of information, and, after conviction, for a new trial, on the ground that the attorney, who signed the bill, as district at*377torney, had become disqualified for the discharge of the functions of that office by having, after his election thereto, accepted the office of attorney for the village of Grand Ooteau, and acted in that capacity. The motions were overruled, and no bills of exception were reserved; and, as the transcript contains no assignment of error, and there is no error patent upon its face, it presents nothing for this court to act on.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Sam
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Jan 5, 1914
Citation: 134 La. 376
Docket Number: No. 20,315
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.