State v. Sakowicz

Jun 18, 1923
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Ctjriam
Per Ctjriam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, ICalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.