State v. Sakowicz
98 N.J.L. 905
N.J.
1923
Check Treatment
Per Ctjriam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, ICalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.