294 Or App 184
Or. Ct. App.
2018

In the Matter of S.-Q. K., a Youth. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S.-Q. K., Appellant.

Multnomah County Circuit Court 15JU03217; Petition Number 150522117; A161045

Court of Appeals of Oregon

September 19, 2018

petition for review denied December 27, 2018 (364 Or 209)

294 Or App 184 | 426 P3d 258

Merri Souther Wyatt, Judge. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

On appellant‘s petition for reconsideration filed July 31, reconsideration allowed, former opinion (292 Or App 836, 426 P3d 659) modified and adhered to as modified September 19. Christa Obold Eshleman for petition.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

PER CURIAM

Appellant has petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. S.-Q. K., 292 Or App 836, 426 P3d 659 (2018), requesting that we correct a factual error in the opinion. See ORAP 6.25(1)(a). Appellant asserts that the opinion “erroneously states that youth was adjudicated for riot, ORS 166.015. 292 Or App at 837, et seq.” Although the delinquency petition originally alleged riot, appellant points out that the juvenile court later amended the petition to conform to the evidence and youth was instead adjudicated for conduct that would constitute disorderly conduct in the second degree, ORS 166.025. Appellant requests that we modify our opinion to correct that error.

Appellant is correct. Therefore, we allow reconsideration and modify the opinion to reflect that youth was adjudicated for conduct that would constitute disorderly conduct in the second degree, ORS 166.025—not riot, ORS 166.015.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.