History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Ryland
120 Wash. 2d 325
| Wash. | 1992
|
Check Treatment
120 Wash. 2d 325 (1992)
840 P.2d 197

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
JAYSEN O.K. RYLAND, Appellant.

No. 59466-0.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

November 25, 1992.

*326 Andrew P. Zinner of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for appellant.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Theresa Fricke, Senior Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

A Department of this court unanimously adopts the reasoning of the dissent in State v. Ryland, 65 Wash. App. 806, 810, 829 P.2d 806 (1992) (Agid, J., dissenting). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the police officer reasonably believed the houseguest had authority to consent to entry. The case is thereafter remanded to the Court of Appeals, Division One, for resolution.

Reconsideration denied December 30, 1992.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ryland
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 25, 1992
Citation: 120 Wash. 2d 325
Docket Number: 59466-0
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.