State v. RussellState v. Russell
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- McGiverin
This case presents the issue of whether a golf cart is a motor vehicle for purposes of the OWI statute,
The facts are not disputed. Stanley Lavern Russell was arrested after a county sheriff observed him operating a golf cart while intoxicated on the streets of Maxwell. Russell’s blood alcohol content tested at .175 on the intoxilyzer.
The State charged Russell by trial information with operating while intoxicated, first offense, in violation of
On appeal, Russell claims the trial court erred in finding a golf cart is a motor vehicle for purposes of
For purposes of 321J.2, a motor vehicle is defined as:
a vehicle which is self-propelled, but not including vehicles known as trackless trolleys which are propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires and are not operated upon rails.
The language of these statutes is clear. Consequently, there is no need to apply the rules of statutory construction other than to apply the statutes as written. See Hinders v. City of Ames, 329 N.W.2d 654, 655 (Iowa 1983).
A golf cart is self-propelled and is not a trackless trolley. It is a device upon which persons or property may be transported upon a highway. It does not fall within the exceptions to the definition of vehicle.
See
AFFIRMED.