midpage

State v. RudnerState v. Rudner

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 3, 1919
Versions:108 A. 15
92 N.J.L. 645
1919 N.J. LEXIS 237
Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice. The supplement thereto by our opinion just filed in State v. Levin (ante p. 553) is applicable also to the present case.

(For dissenting opinion by the Chancellor, see ante p. 555.)

For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 8.

For reversal — The Chancellor, White, Williams, JJ. 3.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Rudner
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 3, 1919
Citations: 108 A. 15; 92 N.J.L. 645; 1919 N.J. LEXIS 237
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In