State v. RoyState v. Roy
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.
O‘CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘DONNELL, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.
Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and R. Lynn Nothstine, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant‘s sixth assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.
O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
William F. Oswall Jr., for appellant.
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} Jason Raymond Tilson of Gahanna, Ohio, received his M.B.A. from the Ohio State University Fisher College of Business in June 2008 and his J.D. from the Moritz College of Law in June 2009. He has applied to register as a candidate for admission to the Ohio bar and has filed an application to take the Ohio bar examination administered in February 2010. Based upon the appli-