State v. Rose
966 A.2d 238
Conn.2009Check Treatment
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that harmless error analysis does not apply where the trial court has compelled the defendant to appear before a jury in identifiable prison garb? If not, was the defendant’s appearance before the jury in identifiable prison garb harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?”
did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
