State v. Rodriguez, 483 So. 2d 751

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order dismissing the information against the defendants. We reverse. The state does not have an obligation to produce witnesses for deposition. State v. Valdes, 443 So.2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Roig, 305 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Once the state revealed the name and address of the informant, it fulfilled its obligation. Consequently, there was no discovery violation and the imposition of a sanction against the state, in this case dismissal of the information, was erroneous. Valdes.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Rodriguez

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jan 28, 1986

Citations: 483 So. 2d 751; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 288; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6022; No. 85-373

Docket Number: No. 85-373

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.