No. 76096 | Fla. | Feb 28, 1991
The State of Florida petitions this Court to review R.L.B. v. State, 562 So. 2d 739" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1990-05-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/rlb-v-state-7583358?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7583358">562 So.2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), in which the Third District Court of Appeal reduced the trial court’s finding of delinquency from third-degree grand theft to the lesser offense of trespass to a conveyance, relying on the “controlling and indistinguishable authority of G.C. v. State, 560 So. 2d 1186" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1990-04-24" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/gc-v-state-1864647?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1864647">560 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).” 562 So.2d at 739. The district court also certified conflict with D.N. v. State, 529 So. 2d 1217" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1988-08-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/dn-v-state-1134443?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1134443">529 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA), review dismissed, 537 So.2d 568 (Fla.1988).
We recently resolved the conflict by our decision in State v. G.C., 572 So. 2d 1380" court="Fla." date_filed="1991-01-03" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-v-gc-1117018?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1117018">572 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1991), which approved the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in G.C. v. State. Because we have resolved the conflict in a manner consistent with this case, the petition for review is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.