History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Riddle
277 S.C. 110
S.C.
1981
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appellant’s probation was revoked following a hearing. He appeals from that revocation.

Counsel for the appellant has filed a brief under authority of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Appellant has filed a pro se brief with this Court.

The revocation hearing was so summary that the record is insufficient for our review.

We therefore reverse the probation revocation and remand the case for a hearing consistent with the guidelines set forth in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U. S. 778, 93 S. Ct. 1756, 36 L. Ed. (2d) 656 (1973) and Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. S. 471, 92 S. Ct. 2593, 33 L. Ed. (2d) 484 (1972). Counsel’s petition to be relieved is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Riddle
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Oct 5, 1981
Citation: 277 S.C. 110
Docket Number: 21579
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.