History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Reilly Enterprises, Inc.
298 So. 2d 405
Fla.
1974
Check Treatment
DEKLE, Justice.

This case is before us upon the same general certified questions involving the new Florida obscenity statute Ch. 73-120 as affected by Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) and Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 93 S.Ct. 2628, 37 L.Ed.2d 446 (1973), as are involved in the similar case of State v. Aiuppa, 298 So.2d 391 (Fla.1974), decided this date.

The certified questions herein are answered in the same manner as set forth in Aiuppa and this reference thereto shall constitute the answers to said certified questions. We similarly uphold the constitutionality vel non of Ch. 73-120.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and CARLTON (Retired), JJ., concur. ADKINS, C. J. and ERVIN, J., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Reilly Enterprises, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: May 1, 1974
Citation: 298 So. 2d 405
Docket Number: No. 44539
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.