91 So. 403 | La. | 1922
By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and' Justices OVERTON and LECHE-,
Defendants were indicted, tried, and convicted, for the larceny of 16 sheep. In this appeal they present as grounds for reversal three bills of exception.
The third bill is to the refusal of the judge to grant a new trial to the accused. The ground alleged for the new trial was that the state had failed to prove the venue. This is a question of fact which the trial judge in- his per curiam says was abundantly proved. We find no error in the judge’s ruling.
The verdict and judgment appealed from are affirmed.