History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Reed
557 So. 2d 33
Fla.
1990
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We review Reed v. State, 545 So.2d 891, 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), in which the Fourth District Court of appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance:

WHEN SENTENCING WITHIN THE GUIDELINES, MAY A TRIAL COURT IMPOSE A SENTENCE OF COMMUNITY CONTROL TO BE FOLLOWED BY PROBATION IF THE TOTAL SENTENCE DOES NOT EXCEED THE TERM PROVIDED BY GENERAL LAW?

Our jurisdiction is predicated upon article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitu-, tion.

We recently addressed this question in Skeens v. State, 556 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1990), in which we held that there was no legal impediment to the stacking of probation and community control to meet individualized sentencing circumstances. Accordingly, we answer the certified question in the affirmative.

We quash the decision below and remand for further proceedings.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Reed
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Mar 1, 1990
Citation: 557 So. 2d 33
Docket Number: No. 74562
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.