State v. RedfieldState v. Redfield
Feb 1, 1932
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.