midpage

State v. ReddickState v. Reddick

Supreme Court of Florida
May 24, 1967
No. 35924
Versions:199 So. 2d 99
1967 Fla. LEXIS 3903
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Reddick
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: May 24, 1967
Citations: 199 So. 2d 99; 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3903; No. 35924
Docket Number: No. 35924
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In