State v. RansomState v. Ransom
JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED
RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 31, 2022
Appearances:
Michael C. O‘Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kevin R. Filiatraut, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Joseph V. Pagano, for appellant.
LISA B. FORBES, J.:
I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 1} On January 6, 2020, Jaquan Ransom (“Ransom“) pled guilty to: involuntary manslaughter, a first-degree felony, in violation of
{¶ 2} It is from this sentence that Ransom appeals, arguing that the Reagan Tokes Law is unconstitutional because it violates the right to trial by jury, the separation-of-powers doctrine, and the right to due process.
II. Law and Analysis
{¶ 3} Ransom‘s assignment of error is overruled pursuant to this court‘s en banc decision in State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470.
{¶ 4} Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.
LISA B. FORBES, JUDGE
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, P.J., and
MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR
N.B. The author of this opinion is constrained to apply Delvallie. For a full explanation, see State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470 (Forbes, J., dissenting).
Judge Mary Eileen Kilbane joined the dissenting opinion by Judge Lisa B. Forbes and the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by Judge Anita Laster Mays in Delvallie and would have found the Reagan Tokes Law unconstitutional.