History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Radziwil
121 N.J. 527
| N.J. | 1990
|
Check Treatment
121 N.J. 527 (1990)
582 A.2d 1003

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PETRO RADZIWIL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 23, 1990.
Decided December 11, 1990.

*528 William E. Norris, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Defender, attorney).

Janet Flanagan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 235 N.J. Super. 557, 563 A.2d 856 (1989).

For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — none.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Radziwil
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 11, 1990
Citation: 121 N.J. 527
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.