midpage

State v. RadeyState v. Radey

Ohio Supreme Court
Jun 27, 1990
No. 89-995
Versions:52 Ohio St. 3d 87
555 N.E.2d 969
1990 Ohio LEXIS 261

This cause came before the court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Franklin County in State v. Wolfe (1987), 41 Ohio App. 3d 119, 534 N.E. 2d 920, upon the following question:

“* * *[W]hether the activities depicted in [the] material [in question] must fall within the definition of sexual conduct as set out in R.C. 2907.01[A] in order for the materials to be considered obscene under constitutional standards.”

We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Parobek (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 61, 550 N.E. 2d 476, and cases cited therein.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Radey
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 27, 1990
Citations: 52 Ohio St. 3d 87; 555 N.E.2d 969; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 261; No. 89-995
Docket Number: No. 89-995
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In