History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Quesinberry
327 N.C. 479
| N.C. | 1990
|
Check Treatment
397 S.E.2d 233 (1990)
327 N.C. 479

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Michael Ray QUESINBERRY.

No. 95A88.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 3, 1990.

Gordon Widenhouse, Asst. Appellate Defender, for defendant.

Ellen B. Scouten, Asst. Atty. Gen., James J. Coman, Sr. Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, ___ U.S. ___ 110 S. Ct. 1465, 108 L. Ed. 2d 603 vacating the judgment of this Court and remanding this cause for further consideration in light of its decision in McKoy v. North Carolina, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S. Ct. 1227, 108 L. Ed. 2d 369 (1990), the following order is entered:

Defendant shall have up to and including 5 November 1990 to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the questions of whether there was error in this case pursuant to McKoy and, if so, whether any such error can be found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. McKoy, 327 N.C. 31, 394 S.E.2d 426 (1990). The State may file its brief in response within 30 days after service of defendant's brief upon it.

*234 By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of October 1990.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Quesinberry
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 3, 1990
Citation: 327 N.C. 479
Docket Number: 95A88
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.