History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Puryear
230 S.E.2d 678
N.C.
1976
Check Treatment
230 S.E.2d 678 (1976)
291 N.C. 325

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Earl V. PURYEAR.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 1976.

Ragsdale, Liggett & Cheshire, for defendant.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Thomas B. Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 719, 228 S.E.2d 536. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Puryear
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Dec 7, 1976
Citation: 230 S.E.2d 678
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.