History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. PROBASCO
277 A.2d 546
| N.J. | 1971
|
Check Treatment
58 N.J. 372 (1971)
277 A.2d 546

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ETHEL W. PROBASCO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 10, 1971.
Decided May 24, 1971.

Mr. Ralph S. Heuser, Jr., argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Heuser & Heuser, attorneys).

Mr. David A. Biederman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion in the Appellate Division, 114 N.J. Super. 546 (1970).

*373 For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. PROBASCO
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 24, 1971
Citation: 277 A.2d 546
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.