State v. PottsState v. Potts
We have on appeal Potts v. State, 526 So.2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), which declared unconstitutional a portion of
Having reviewed the entire record in this case, we have determined that the district court‘s decision below is an eminently correct statement of the law. The state through its criminal process may not penalize someone merely for the status of being under indictment or otherwise accused of a crime, as it has attempted to do here. We therefore approve and adopt the district court‘s opinion in its entirety as our own.
It is so ordered.
McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.