State v. PleasantState v. Pleasant
The defendant Roselia Pleasant was charged by indictment on October 28, 1987 with distribution of heroin, a violation of
A. Errors Patent
A review of the record reveals no errors patent.
B. Assignment of Error
By the defendant‘s single assignment of error, she contends that the trial court erred by denying her parole eligibility. According to the minute entry from sentencing, the trial court denied parole eligibility. However, the sentencing transcript reveals that the trial court did not deny parole eligibility. In such situations, the transcript is controlling. State v. Herbert, 508 So.2d 973 (La.App. 4th Cir.1987). This assignment is without merit.
Accordingly, the defendant‘s convictions and sentences are hereby affirmed.
AFFIRMED.