State v. Pitman

Apr 11, 1924
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For ajjirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn,. Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, ‘Van Buskiric, Clark, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.