State v. Pitman

Apr 11, 1924
Versions:124 A. 926
99 N.J.L. 527
1924 N.J. LEXIS 186
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For ajjirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn,. Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, 'Van Buskiric, Clark, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.